
Why Twitter’s Logo Redesign Was ‘Obviously’ the Best Idea Ever (Not Really)
Ah, change. It’s exciting, bold, and forward-thinking—or, at least, that’s how it’s supposed to feel. But when the Twitter’s logo redesign introduced the new “X” logo, the response was less wow and more why? The beloved blue bird called ‘Larry’, which symbolised connection, simplicity, and community was swapped for a sharp, stark “X” that feels more like a random placeholder than anything remotely related to what the platform stood for until now. Bold move? Sure. Smart move? Debatable.
At Creativate, we believe design isn’t just about what looks good. It’s about functionality, strategy, and understanding your audience. So, let’s unpack why the Twitter redesign has become a cautionary tale for brands everywhere—and what we can all learn from it.
‘Change’ a.k.a. The Necessary Evil We All Tread Carefully
Change can be risky, especially when it disrupts something iconic. For years, Twitter’s blue bird wasn’t just a logo; it was the face of a global platform. It represented communication, connection, and, let’s be honest, a little bit of chaos. So, replacing it with an “X” was always going to be a gamble.
Here’s the catch: people rarely love change, especially when it feels unnecessary. Twitter’s audience wasn’t asking for a new logo. They were asking for practical features—an edit button, for instance. Instead of delivering those requests, Twitter handed them a whole new brand identity. It’s almost like asking for a cup of tea and being served a glass of warm soda instead.
Process Is Everything and…It Was Nowhere to Be Found
At the heart of any successful redesign is a robust process. Research, user feedback, and strategic planning ensure that changes align with both brand values and audience needs. Unfortunately, the Twitter rebrand seems to have skipped a few of these steps.
The timeline says it all: one day, Elon Musk decided it was time for a new visual identity. Hours later, the bird was gone, replaced by the X logo. No extensive user testing, no gradual rollout—just a design overhaul that left users scrambling to figure out what had happened.
The result? A logo that may look sleek but feels disconnected from the platform’s identity and purpose.
Accessibility is a Balancing Act
Twitter’s redesign didn’t stop at the logo. The changes extended to fonts, colour schemes, and buttons—all under the banner of “accessibility.” While it’s commendable to prioritise inclusivity, execution matters.
- The Chirp font was introduced as part of a branding overhaul, but many users found it difficult to read. It’s especially problematic for those with dyslexia or astigmatism, making the platform less accessible for them.
- The high-contrast colour scheme, while great for visibility, has been flagged by users prone to migraines or eye strain.
- Button colours were flipped, leading to a frustrating wave of accidental unfollows.
While some of these changes addressed specific accessibility needs, they inadvertently created new barriers for others. A more thoughtful approach—one that allowed users to customise their experience—could have avoided this.
Lessons for Brands
Twitter’s redesign is more than just a questionable aesthetic choice; it’s a reminder of how critical user experience and process are in branding. Here are a few takeaways for businesses:
- Your audience matters: Before making major changes, listen to your users. What are they asking for? What problems do they face? Address those needs first.
- Test, test, and test again: User testing isn’t a box to tick; it’s an essential step to ensure your changes enhance, rather than hinder, the user experience.
- Make changes optional: People like having choices. Offering customisation options allows users to engage with new features on their own terms, rather than being forced into them.
A Reminder of Design’s Purpose
At its core, design is about solving problems and connecting people. It’s about aligning aesthetics with functionality, and strategy with practicality. While Twitter’s redesign has certainly sparked conversation, it’s also highlighted what happens when the design process is rushed, and user needs are overlooked.
So, if there’s one thing we can thank Twitter (or X) for, it’s this valuable lesson: good design isn’t just bold—it’s thoughtful, purposeful, and inclusive. At Creativate, we champion designs that not only look great but also work brilliantly for the people who use them. Because in the end, design isn’t about making a statement; it’s about making an impact.